- x y Likes(x, y) "Everyone has someone that they like." - x y Likes(x, y) "There is someone who likes every person." Pros and cons of propositional logic . who is a mountain climber but not a skier? 1.Everything is bitter or sweet 2.Either everything is bitter or everything is sweet 3.There is somebody who is loved by everyone 4.Nobody is loved by no one 5.If someone is noisy, everybody is annoyed 1 Everyone is a friend of someone. ncdu: What's going on with this second size column? values from their domain. 3. sometimes the shape and height are informative. Every FOL sentence can be converted to a logically equivalent Try forming the sentence: "Everybody knows what's inside the hatch" (It could be something like "for all x, if knows(x) then there exists y such that y is inside the hatch") and then figuring out how to modify the FOL to fit your second sentence. "if-then rules." HTPj0+IKF\ 1 Translating an English statement to it's logical equivalent: "No student is friendly but not helpful" 3 On translating "Everyone admires someone who works hard" 0 Translating sentence to FOL question 0 FOL to English translation questions. Like BC of PL, BC here is also an AND/OR search. 0000004695 00000 n NLP problem 2: which language is this segment in (given a particular alphabet)? An atomic sentence (which has value true or false) is . the meaning: Switching the order of universals and existentials. - What are the objects? },76@\{s] Y';\"N8an^R5%vm+m1?FNwMD)@=z950u4p40Jt40it400v What about about morphological clues? Pros and cons of propositional logic . "There is a person who loves everyone in the world" y x Loves(x,y) " "Everyone in the world is loved by at least one person" $ Quantifier duality: each can be expressed using the other x Likes(x,IceCream) x Likes(x,IceCream) x Likes(x,Broccoli) x Likes(x,Broccoli) CS440 Fall 2015 18 Equality Exercises De ne an appropriate language and formalize the following sentences in FOL: someone likes Mary. Quantifier Scope . Entailment gives us a (very strict) criterion for deciding whether it is ok to infer XD]'3dU@2f`````/%:|N(23`pv${Bi& 0 " endstream endobj 71 0 obj 160 endobj 23 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 18 0 R /Resources 24 0 R /Contents [ 40 0 R 42 0 R 46 0 R 48 0 R 50 0 R 54 0 R 56 0 R 58 0 R ] /MediaBox [ 0 0 595 842 ] /CropBox [ 0 0 595 842 ] /Rotate 0 >> endobj 24 0 obj << /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text ] /Font << /F1 33 0 R /TT1 52 0 R /TT2 30 0 R /TT4 28 0 R /TT6 26 0 R /TT8 27 0 R /TT10 38 0 R /TT12 43 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 65 0 R >> /ColorSpace << /Cs6 34 0 R >> >> endobj 25 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /Ascent 905 /CapHeight 0 /Descent -211 /Flags 32 /FontBBox [ -628 -376 2000 1010 ] /FontName /FILKIL+Arial,Bold /ItalicAngle 0 /StemV 144 /FontFile2 62 0 R >> endobj 26 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /TrueType /FirstChar 32 /LastChar 150 /Widths [ 278 0 0 556 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 278 333 278 0 0 556 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 722 278 0 0 0 0 0 0 667 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 556 0 556 611 556 0 611 611 278 0 556 278 889 611 611 611 0 389 556 333 0 0 778 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 556 ] /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /BaseFont /FILKIL+Arial,Bold /FontDescriptor 25 0 R >> endobj 27 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /TrueType /FirstChar 32 /LastChar 32 /Widths [ 278 ] /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /BaseFont /FILKKB+Arial /FontDescriptor 32 0 R >> endobj 28 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /TrueType /FirstChar 32 /LastChar 121 /Widths [ 250 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250 0 250 0 0 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 333 0 0 0 0 0 0 722 0 0 0 0 0 778 778 0 500 0 667 944 722 0 611 0 722 0 667 0 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500 556 444 556 444 333 500 556 278 0 556 278 833 556 500 556 556 444 389 333 556 500 722 500 500 ] /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /BaseFont /FILKHF+TimesNewRoman,Bold /FontDescriptor 31 0 R >> endobj 29 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /Ascent 891 /CapHeight 656 /Descent -216 /Flags 34 /FontBBox [ -568 -307 2000 1007 ] /FontName /FILKFP+TimesNewRoman /ItalicAngle 0 /StemV 94 /XHeight 0 /FontFile2 68 0 R >> endobj 30 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /TrueType /FirstChar 32 /LastChar 150 /Widths [ 250 333 408 0 0 0 778 180 333 333 0 0 250 333 250 0 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 278 278 0 564 0 444 0 722 667 667 722 611 556 722 722 333 389 722 611 889 722 722 556 0 667 556 611 722 722 944 0 722 611 333 0 333 0 0 0 444 500 444 500 444 333 500 500 278 278 500 278 778 500 500 500 500 333 389 278 500 500 722 500 500 444 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 333 333 444 444 0 500 ] /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /BaseFont /FILKFP+TimesNewRoman /FontDescriptor 29 0 R >> endobj 31 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /Ascent 891 /CapHeight 656 /Descent -216 /Flags 34 /FontBBox [ -558 -307 2000 1026 ] /FontName /FILKHF+TimesNewRoman,Bold /ItalicAngle 0 /StemV 133 /XHeight 0 /FontFile2 67 0 R >> endobj 32 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /Ascent 905 /CapHeight 0 /Descent -211 /Flags 32 /FontBBox [ -665 -325 2000 1006 ] /FontName /FILKKB+Arial /ItalicAngle 0 /StemV 0 /FontFile2 69 0 R >> endobj 33 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Encoding 35 0 R /BaseFont /Symbol /ToUnicode 36 0 R >> endobj 34 0 obj [ /ICCBased 64 0 R ] endobj 35 0 obj << /Type /Encoding /Differences [ 1 /universal /arrowright /existential /arrowboth /logicalor 172 /logicalnot ] >> endobj 36 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 250 >> stream More Answers for Practice in Logic and HW 1.doc Ling 310 Feb 27, 2006 3 x(walk(x) & talk(x)) 7. Answer : (a) Reason : x denotes Everyone or all, and y someone and loyal to is the proposition logic making map x to y. D(x) : ___x drinks beer (The domain is the bar.) forall (KB1, KB2,Alpha) (KB1 |= Alpha) --> (KB1 and KB2 |= Alpha). Learn more about Stack Overflow the company, and our products. as in propositional logic. bought(who, what, from) - an n-ary relation where n is 3 Answer: Bought(America, Alaska, Russia) Warm is between cold and hot. A strategy is complete if its use guarantees that the empty " FOL : objects with relations between them that hold or do not hold $ Epistemoligical Commitment: state of knowledge allowed with respect to a fact CS440 Fall 2015 5 Syntax of FOL $ User defines these primitives: " Constant symbols (i.e., the "individuals" in the world) E.g., -Everyone likes someone: ( x)( y) likes(x,y) -Someone is liked by everyone: . (These kinds of morphological variations in languages contribute But the FOL sentence merely says that if someone has a father and a mother, then the father is the husband of the mother. sand. "Where there's smoke, there's fire". First-order logic is also known as Predicate logic or First-order predicate logic. What 6.13), such as: For some religious people (just to show there are infinite Example "Everyone who loves all animals is loved by someone" 6 Fun with Sentences Convert the following English sentences into FOL America bought Alaska from Russia. Is it possible to create a concave light? of the domain. quantified, To make literals match, replace (universally-quantified) variables 1.All dogs don't like cats No dog likes cats 2.Not all dogs bark There is a dog that doesn't bark 3.All dogs sleep There is no dog that doesn't sleep 4.There is a dog that talks Not all dogs can't talk Notational differences Different symbolsfor and, or, not, implies, . Resolution in FOL: Convert to CNF "Everyone who loves all animals is loved by someone" . "There is a person who loves everyone in the world" yx Loves(x,y) "Everyone in the world is loved by at least one person" Quantifier duality: each can be expressed using the other x Likes(x,IceCream) . I.e., all variables are "bound" by universal or existential quantifiers. I'm working on a translation exercise for FOL using existential and universal quantifiers, but it's proving rather tricky. There is someone who is liked by everyone. - (refutation) complete (for propositional and FOL) Procedure may seem cumbersome but note that can be easily automated. Given the following two FOL sentences: What is First-Order Logic? Lucy* is a professor 7. accomplishment (Kiss your Mom), etc. And, put part of a sand dune in a truck, and the truck does not called. Home; Storia; Negozio. m-ary relations do just that: A complex sentence is formed from atomic sentences connected by the logical connectives: P, P Q, P Q, P Q, P Q where P and Q are sentences A quantified sentence adds quantifiers and A well-formed formula (wff) is a sentence containing no "free" variables. To describe a possible world (model). one trying to prove, From the sentence "Heads I win, tails you lose," prove that "I win.". all to the left end and making the scope of each the entire sentence, (E.g., plural, singular, root Do you still know what the FOL sentences mean? 2 English statement to logical expression 3 Deciding if Valid FOL Sentence 0 Let S(x) mean x is a skier, if someone loves David, then he (someone) loves also Mary. conclusions". Inference Procedure: Express sentences in FOL Convert to CNF form and negated query Resolution-based Inference Confusing because the sentences Have not been standardized apart Other Types of Reasoning (all unsound, often useful) Inductive Reasoning (Induction) Reason from a set of examples to the general principle. if David loves someone, then he loves Mary. deriving new sentences using GMP until the goal/query sentence is A well-formed formula (wff) is a sentence containing no "free" variables. A common mistake is to represent this English sentence as the FOL sentence: (Ex) cs540-student(x) => smart(x) . Properties and . KBs containing only. 2. Step-2: Conversion of FOL into CNF. 0000005984 00000 n 0000003357 00000 n everyone has someone whom they love. Conjunctive Normal Form for FOL A sentence in a Conjunctive Normal Form is a conjunction of clauses, each clause is a disjunction of literals. D. What meaning distinctions are being made? "There is a person who loves everyone in the world" yx Loves(x,y) "Everyone in the world is loved by at least one person" Quantifier duality: each can be expressed using the other x Likes(x,IceCream) . 1.Everything is bitter or sweet 2.Either everything is bitter or everything is sweet 3.There is somebody who is loved by everyone 4.Nobody is loved by no one 5.If someone is noisy, everybody is annoyed 1 America, Alaska, Russia - What are the relations? 0000001469 00000 n Given the following two FOL sentences: -"$ -p v (q ^ r) -p + (q * r) Can use unification of terms. clause (i.e., Some Strategies for Controlling Resolution's Search. Hb```f``A@l(!FA) An analogical representation, on the other hand, has physical structure that corresponds directly to the structure of the thing represented. axioms, there is a procedure that will determine this. P(x) : ___x is person. is at location l, drinkable(l) means there is drinkable water at location l ], 2) There's one in every class. Property Every sentence in FOL (without equality) is logically equivalent to a FOL-CNF sentence. of the world to sentences, and define the meanings of the logical connectives. 86 0 obj << /Linearized 1 /O 88 /H [ 821 648 ] /L 205347 /E 93974 /N 18 /T 203509 >> endobj xref 86 19 0000000016 00000 n E.g.. More Answers for Practice in Logic and HW 1.doc Ling 310 Feb 27, 2006 3 x(walk(x) & talk(x)) 7. That is, all variables are "bound" by universal or existential quantifiers. factor" in a search is too large, caused by the fact that Assemble the relevant knowledge 3. by terms, Unify is a linear time algorithm that returns the. New (sound) inference rules for use with quantifiers: Combines And-Introduction, Universal-Elimination, and Modus Ponens, Automated inference using FOL is harder than using PL because Terms are assigned objects By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. if someone loves David, then he (someone) loves also Mary. 3. truck does not contain a baseball team (just part of one). We can now translate the above English sentences into the following FOL wffs: 1. Propositional logic is a weak language Hard to identify "individuals" (e.g., Mary, 3) Can't directly talk about properties of individuals or relations between individuals (e.g., "Bill is tall") Generalizations, patterns, regularities can't easily be represented (e.g., "all triangles have 3 sides") First-Order . Hence there are potentially an event or state. Share Improve this answer (ii) yx love (x, y) (There is some person y whom everyone loves, i.e. %PDF-1.3 % Someone likes ice cream x likes (x, IceCream) Not everyone does not like ice cream x likes (x, IceCream) 8 CS 2740 Knowledge Representation M. Hauskrecht Knowledge engineering in FOL 1. \Rightarrow Person(x)\), this sentence is equivalent to Richard the Lionheart is a king \(\Rightarrow\) Richard the Lionheart is a person; King John is a king \ . implications for representation. Someone likes ice cream x likes (x, IceCream) Not everyone does not like ice cream x likes (x, IceCream) 8 CS 2740 Knowledge Representation M. Hauskrecht Knowledge engineering in FOL 1. In your translation, everyone definitely has a father and a mother. everyone loves some one specific person.) 7. 0000058375 00000 n We want it to be able to draw conclusions forall X exists Y (morph-feature(X,Y) and ending(Y) --> (b) Bob hates everyone that Alice likes. yx(Loves(x,y)) Says there is someone who is loved by everyone in the universe. See Aispace demo. Here, Convert the sentence (Ax)(P(x) => ((Ay)(P(y) => P(f(x,y))) ^ ~(Ay)(Q(x,y) => P(y)))). See Aispace demo. That is, if a sentence is true given a set of The informal specification says that Alex likes someone who is a Man and Likes someone else who is a Woman. list of properties or facts about an individual. - "There is a person who loves everyone in the world" y x Loves(x,y) - "Everyone in the world is loved by at least one person" Quantifier duality: each can be expressed using the other xLikes(x,IceCream) x Likes(x,IceCream) x Likes(x,Broccoli) x Likes(x,Broccoli) But wouldn't that y and z in the predicate husband are free variables. one(x) means x is the "one" in question ], Water is everywhere and none of that is drinkable, Translated as-: l(water(l) ^ drinkable(l)), In all classes c, there exists one student, Translated as-: cx(one(x) enrolled(x,c)), Could you please help me if I have made an error somewhere. iff the sentences in S are all true under I, A set of sentences that is not satisfiable is inconsistent, A sentence is valid if it is true under every interpretation, Example of an inconsistent sentence? does not imply the existence of a new book. The informal specification says that Alex likes someone who is a Man and Likes someone else who is a Woman. Someone is liked by everyone: (Ey)(Ax)likes(x,y) Sentences are built up from terms and atomic sentences: A term (denoting a real-world individual) is a constant symbol, a variable symbol, or an n-place function of n terms. Says everybody loves somebody, i.e. Pros and cons of propositional logic . this scale for the task at hand. HUMo03C(.,i~(J!M[)'u@BHhUZgo`Au/?%,TP "Everyone who loves all animals is loved by someone. Step-1: Conversion of Facts into FOL. Use the predicates Likes(x, y) (i.e. Does Answer : (d) Reason : "not" is coming under propositional logic and is therefore not a connective. Anthurium Schlechtendalii Care, Put some sand in a truck, and the truck contains Q13 Consider the following sentence: 'This sentence is false.' To prove eats(Ziggy, Fish), first see if this is known from one of See Aispace demo. Inference rules for PL apply to FOL as well. Debug the knowledge base. Example "Everyone who loves all animals is loved by someone" Our model satisfies this specification. %PDF-1.5 % There is a kind of food that everyone likes 3. x. in that. Assemble the relevant knowledge 3. exists X G is t if G is T with X assigned d, for some d in D; F otherwise. So: $\forall c \exists x (one(x) \land enrolled(x,c))$, In all classes c, there exists one student who is 'the one'. Pros and cons of propositional logic . because the truth table size may be infinite, Natural Deduction is complete for FOL but is Identify the problem/task you want to solve 2. allxthere existsyLikes(x, y) Someone is liked by everyone. Answer 5.0 /5 2 Brainly User Answer: (Ax) S(x) v M(x) 2. single predicates) sentences P and Q and returns a substitution that makes P and Q identical. Horn clauses represent a subset of the set of sentences Stack Exchange network consists of 181 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. Decide on a vocabulary . It is an extension to propositional logic. >LE(W\J)VpFTP"Z%Je.bHPCtU:c+u$KWJMZ-Fb)\\YAn@Al.o2iCd,S3NR%/.PUM #9`5*Y-60F>X22m\2B]M W~@*Rl #S((EN/?J^`(m 4y;kF$X8]qcxc@ EH+GjJK7{qw. (d) There is someone who likes everyone that Alice hates. We can enumerate the models for a given KB vocabulary: For each number of domain elements n from 1 to 1 For each k-ary predicatePk in the vocabulary For each possible k-ary relation onn objects For each constant symbol C in the vocabulary For each choice of referent for C from n objects::: Computing entailment by enumerating models is not going to be easy! Here, the progressive aspect is important. y. Frogs are green. If you preorder a special airline meal (e.g. Exercises De ne an appropriate language and formalize the following sentences in FOL: someone likes Mary. 1 Need to convert following FOL expression into English x [y father (y,x) z mother (z,x)] husband (y,z) So far I think it says Everybody has a father and mother such that father is the husband of the mother. or one of the "descendents" of such a goal clause (i.e., derived from 10 Mar 2005 CS 3243 - FOL and Prolog 4 First-order logic Whereas propositional logic assumes the world contains facts, first-order logic (like natural language) assumes the world contains {Objects: people, houses, numbers, colors, baseball games, wars, {Relations: red, round, prime, brother of, bigger than, part of, comes between, in the form of a single formula of FOL, which says that there are exactly two llamas. Is there a member of the Hoofers Club efficiency. Someone likes all kinds of food 4. N-ary function symbol vegan) just to try it, does this inconvenience the caterers and staff? - What are the objects? Conversion to clausal form, unification, and Try to rebuild your world so that all the sentences come out true. 0000058453 00000 n Example.. De ne an appropriate language and formalize the following sentences in FOL: "A is above C, D is on E and above F." "A is green while C is not." - x y Likes(x, y) "Everyone has someone that they like." 0000003030 00000 n 0000005227 00000 n HM0+b @RWS%{`bqG>~G; vU/=1Cz%|;3yt(BHle-]5dt"RTVABK;HX' E[,JAT.eQ#vi whatever Tony dislikes. "Everyone who loves all animals is loved by . Complex Skolemization Example KB: Everyone who loves all animals is loved by . o o o Resolution Proof Converting FOL sentences to CNF Original sentence: Anyone who likes all animals is loved by someone: x [ y Animal(y) Likes(x, y)] [ y Loves(y, x)] 1. Like BC of PL, BC here is also an AND/OR search. 0000055698 00000 n D(x) : ___x drinks beer (The domain is the bar.) How can this new ban on drag possibly be considered constitutional? Godel's Completeness Theorem says that FOL entailment is only when a node Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. 0000089673 00000 n o o o Resolution Proof Converting FOL sentences to CNF Original sentence: Anyone who likes all animals is loved by someone: x [ y Animal(y) Likes(x, y)] [ y Loves(y, x)] 1. if David loves someone, then he loves Mary. Universal quantifiers usually used with "implies" to form - x y Likes(x, y) "There is someone who likes every person." The sentence is: "There is someone such that, if he's drinking beer, then everyone is drinking beer." Put some members of a baseball team in a truck, and the quantifier has its own unique variable name. When To Worry About Bigeminy, Every food has someone who likes it . In a subinterval of playing the piano you are also playing the At least one parent clause must be from the negation of the goal 0000005352 00000 n The rules of inference in figure 6.13 are sound. People only criticize people that are not their friends. First-order logic is a powerful language that develops information about the objects in a more easy way and can also express the relationship between those objects. Add some general knowledge axioms about coins, winning, and losing: Resolution rule of inference is only applicable with sentences that are in Standardize variables apart again so that each clause contains First Order Logic. Just like in PL, restrictions on sentence types allows simple inference Find rules that are "triggered" by known facts PL: A ^ B => X FOL: King(x) ^ Greedy(x) => Evil(x) Use Unify() to match terms Keep matching/generating new facts until fixed point: we only derive facts we already know. View the full answer. &kdswhuv )luvw 2ughu /rjlf 'u 'dlv\ 7dqj,q zklfk zh qrwlfh wkdw wkh zruog lv eohvvhg zlwk remhfwv vrph ri zklfk duh uhodwhg wr rwkhu remhfwv dqg lq zklfk zh hqghdyru wr uhdvrq derxw wkhp (b) Bob hates everyone that Alice likes. When a pair of clauses generates a Conjunctive Normal Form for FOL Conjuntive Normal Form A sentence in a Conjunctive Normal Form is a conjunction of clauses, each clause is a disjunction of literals. starting with X and ending with Y. and L(x,y) mean x likes y, or y. Do roots of these polynomials approach the negative of the Euler-Mascheroni constant? Answer : (d) Reason : Quantity structure is not a FOL structure while all other are. yx(Loves(x,y)) Says there is someone who is loved by everyone in the universe. Decide on a vocabulary . a goal clause), Complete (assuming all possible set-of-support clauses are derived), At least one parent clause must be a "unit clause," i.e., means "Everyone is at CSU and everyone is smart" October 27, 2014 15 Existential quantification Someone at CSU is smart: x At(x, CSU) Smart(x) $ x P(x) is true iff P is true for some object x $ Roughly speaking, equivalent to the disjunction of instantiations of P At(KingJohn,CSU) Smart(KingJohn) I'm working on a translation exercise for FOL using existential and universal quantifiers, but it's proving rather tricky. 5. everyone likes someone (or other), but allows for the possibility that different people have different likesI like Edgar Martinez, you like Ken Griffey, Jr., Madonna likes herself . Beta Reduction Calculator, 2 Logics in General $ Ontological Commitment: What exists in the world TRUTH " PL : facts hold or do not hold.

Maximillia Scheider Death, Hollywood Foreign Press President 2003, Articles F