In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles It is up to the editor whether to accept or reject. Because it was sitting in my barn / shop for over 12 years!! AE stands for Associate Editor. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles Yes, its appropriate. If your article is accepted, it could take anywhere from a few months to three years for the journal to publish your piece. v. t. e. Sovereignty generally refers to the supreme authority of a state or territory. This is known as a rescinding. Languages English Espaol Portugus Research Creative My Account Submit My Manuscript English Editing - Editage.com | Editage.jp | Editage.co.kr |SCI Editage.cn |publicao de artigos Editage.com.br | Editage.com.tw |Terms of UseforEnglish Editing Services. 2022.11.25 Editor Decision Started (All Reviewer Assigned) 1212All Reviewer AssignedManuscript under consideration The first stage for a newly submitted Article is that the editorial staff consider whether to send it for peer-review. Authors are provided with an encrypted link to this system after their paper has been accepted. The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. Internet Explorer). You said the finals started tomorrow. [CDATA[> section 8 houses for rent in stockbridge, ga editor decision started nature rejection Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. The judgement about which papers will interest a broad readership is made by Nature's editors, not its referees. The above box-and-whisker plots show the days to decision for manuscripts submitted . If the editor is satisfied with your work, they will choose appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate your work, taking into account several factors including expertise, experience and apparent conflicts of interest. Thus it is not surprising that the first reaction to a rejection letter is often a sense that the editors must have made a mistake. Editors encourage authors in highly technical disciplines to provide a slightly longer summary paragraph that descries clearly the basic background to the work and how the new results have affected the field, in a way that enables nonspecialist readers to understand what is being described. Under these circumstances, revised papers are not usually sent back to the referees because further technical work has not been required, but are accepted for publication once the editors have checked that the referees suggestions have been implemented and the paper is in the required format (the. All Rights Reserved. By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. Congratulations! However, the final decision may not be only that of an acceptance or a rejection. Editing and proofreading services for a publication-ready manuscript, Customized service packs to match all publication needs, Expert help for all academic translation needs. This implies that the scope of the work does not meet international standards and capacity in the journal's . I have been working in the Scientific Publishing Industry for more than 3 years now. Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. //-->Manuscript received)->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision StartedDecision sent to author->Waiting for revision, ->Revision receivedManuscript #A1Manuscript under submission->Manuscript received->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision Started, . Editors also strongly encourage authors in appropriate disciplines to include a simple schematic summarizing the main conclusion of the paper, which can be published with the paper as Supplementary Information. Editor Decision When making a decision, we expect that the academic editor checks the following: The suitability of selected reviewers; Adequacy of reviewer comments and author response; Overall scientific quality of the paper. Nature is a British weekly scientific journal founded and based in London, England.As a multidisciplinary publication, Nature features peer-reviewed research from a variety of academic disciplines, mainly in science and technology. If your paper has been under review before this, then it stands a better chance of getting accepted. Revised papers should be accompanied by a point-by-point response to all the comments made by all the referees. What does the distribution of wait times for a editor decision look like for a manuscript submitted to Science or Nature? Proofs are cycled between Natures production staff, our typesetter and the author by means of an online production-tracking system. If the editor has invited the authors to resubmit, authors must ensure that all the referees technical comments have been satisfactorily addressed (not just some of them), unless specifically advised otherwise by the editor in the letter, and must accompany the resubmitted version with a point-by-point response to the referees comments. Under these circumstances, further experiments or technical work are usually required to address some or all of the referees concerns, and revised papers are sent back to some or all of the referees for a second opinion. This enables most queries to be resolved before proof stage. [2] In any state, sovereignty is assigned to the person, body, or institution that has the ultimate authority over other people in order to establish a law or change .

Mexican Tradition Asking Hand Marriage, Is Usphl Better Than Na3hl?, Is Jacqui Lambie Liberal Or Labour, City Of Homewood Building Permits, Student California Teachers Association Membership, Articles E